Angelina Jolie’s legal team alleged Brad Pitt’s abuse toward her started way before their 2016 plane incident.
Angelina Jolie is alleging that her ex-husband Brad Pitt’s physical abuse toward her “started well before” the 2016 plane incident that resulted in her filing for divorce, per documents obtained by Page Six.
On Thursday, the “Maleficent” actress’ legal team made the bombshell claims in an attempt to release communications that would prove the “Fight Club” star refused to allow his ex-wife to sell her portion of their Chateau Miraval French winery unless she signed an “onerous” and “expansive” NDA.
“While Pitt’s history of physical abuse of Jolie started well before the family’s September 2016 plane trip from France to Los Angeles, this flight marked the first time he turned his physical abuse on the children as well. Jolie then immediately left him,” the document reads.
The “Maleficent” actress’ legal team made the bombshell claims in a new court filing Thursday as they attempt to prove her ex-husband refused to purchase Jolie’s shares of their Chateau Miraval French winery unless she signed an “expansive” NDA.UK Press via Getty Images
“While Pitt’s history of physical abuse of Jolie started well before the family’s September 2016 plane trip from France to Los Angeles, this flight marked the first time he turned his physical abuse on the children as well,” the filing reads.
According to the filing, the NDA Pitt, 60, allegedly proposed to Jolie, 48, would cover his “personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not,” in an attempt to prevent her from speaking on his alleged abuse.
Jolie’s lawyers also alleged Pitt wanted her to “contractually bind herself” to silence after he discovered in 2021 that she submitted a sealed filing, consisting of “emails, summaries of the family’s expected testimony and other evidence” to help settle their child custody dispute.
At the time, Pitt agreed to purchase Jolie’s shares of the French winery but allegedly backed out as he feared his ex’s sealed documents “could eventually become public,” the documents continue.
“Jolie then immediately left him,” the documents continue.Getty Images
Per Jolie’s legal team, the NDA Pitt proposed would cover his “personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”Getty Images
“Mr. Pitt refused to purchase Ms. Jolie’s interest when she would not be silenced by his NDA,” the “Salt” actress’ attorney Paul Murphy said in a statement to Page Six.
“By refusing to buy her interest but then suing her, Mr. Pitt put directly at issue why that NDA was so important to him and what he hoped it would bury: his abuse of Ms. Jolie and their family,” he continued, referencing Pitt’s 2022 lawsuit against Jolie for selling her shares of the winery to another party.
Thursday’s filing also claims Jolie “never pressed charges” against her “Mr. & Mrs. Smith” co-star because “she believed the best course was for Pitt to accept responsibility and help the family recover from the post-traumatic stress he caused.”
Her lawyers alleged the NDA was an attempt to prevent her from speaking out about Pitt’s alleged abuse.Getty Images
The “Salt” star ended up sharing her portion of the estate to another entity.
A rep for Pitt wasn’t immediately available for comment.
However, a source familiar with the “Moneyball” actor told Page Six that Jolie “continually tries to distract from legal losses by offering irrelevant or inaccurate information” in further court filings.
“There’s a pattern that every time she loses, she continues to come back to this… there’s nothing new here,” the insider added.
Per documents previously obtained by Page Six in June 2023, Pitt alleged his “vindictive” ex-wife sold her shares of Château Miraval in spite of him after he was granted joint custody of their six children, though the decision was later overturned.
As a result, the “Bullet Train” actor sued Jolie.Getty Images
A source close to Pitt told Page Six that Jolie “continually tries to distract from legal losses by offering irrelevant or inaccurate information” in court filings.Getty Images
“There’s a pattern that every time she loses, she continues to come back to this… there’s nothing new here,” the source continued.Pascal Le Segretain
The filing also alleged Jolie was the one to present “an even broader” NDA agreement while Pitt’s team presented a “standard” NDA, solely intended to “intended to protect the business.
“The clause also made clear that there would be no limitation on Jolie’s ability to speak in connection with Pitt and Jolie’s divorce or custody proceedings,” the documents read.
“It specifically provided: This commitment shall however not limit the ability, for any Party, to make any claims, filings or testimony in any legal proceedings.”
The couple purchased the winery in 2008.AFP/Getty Images
They called it quits in 2016.